260
Remington Ackley Improved
Chambering
Brass Selection, Brass
Preparation Techniques, and An Alternate Method for Fireforming
Background
The 260AI rifle project was started
after shooting a 6.5-284 for a couple of varmint hunting
seasons, with the goal to able to equal the larger cartridge's external
ballistic performance with less powder, more efficiency, and
hopefully more barrel life. The initial tests were performed
with a end-of-life 3 groove 9" twist Pac-Nor barrel taken off
the 6.5-284, then set back and chambered with a 6.5-243 Improved
reamer from Dave Kiff at Pacific Tool and Gauge, with the throat
length set for the Sierra 142 grain MatchKing bullets.
As this project unfolded, a number of
lessons were learned regarding brass preparation and methods of
fireforming the Ackley Improved cases, as well as issues induced
by using necked up .243 Lapua brass.
Initial Tests - 260
Remington Brass Preparation and Traditional Fireforming
Standard Remington 260 brass was used
during the initial testing,
and 100 cases were screened by measuring the neck wall
thickness, and discarding any that exceeded 0.0015" total
variation around the circumference of the neck. Out of the initial batch
of 100, 83 cases met this criteria. The primer pockets were uniformed with a Haydon carbide
uniformer tool, and the flash holes were deburred using a Haydon
flash hole tool. The necks were sized in a Lee 260 Remington
collet die, then inside and outside chamfered. The cases were
then primed with Federal GM215M
large rifle match magnum primers.
Fireforming was performed using the
tried-and-true method of seating a bullet past the jam point,
with good neck tension, so that the case would be held firmly
against the bolt face upon initial firing. The load used was
47.4 grains Ramshot Hunter, under a 142 grain moly Sierra MatchKing. This load resulted in velocities around 2950 FPS, and
accuracy at about 0.5 MOA for 5 shot groups. There were no split
necks out of this first batch of cases, and the fired case
length was very consistent. The length was measured using a
Stoney Point case comparator on a pair of digital calipers, with
the length variations under +-0.001" for all the 83 cases. The
brass had a water capacity of 57.4 grains after fireforming. More
importantly, there were no donuts formed inside the case at the
neck and shoulder junction point.
Switch
Barrel Project Rifle - .243 Win. Lapua Brass Preparation and
Fireforming
Based on the
positive preliminary test results, a 29.5" Bartlein 5R, 8.5" twist,
1.25" straight cylinder contour barrel was chambered with
the 6.5-243 Improved reamer and fitted to the trued Remington
action and Lowrider stock that is the platform for a very
accurate 6mm Dasher rifle. This action has a pinned recoil lug
for Holland's,
allowing easy field swapping between the 6mm and 6.5mm chamberings.
Due to the lack of
availability of 260 Remington brass from Remington at the time
of this second set of tests, the decision was made to use neck expanded
Lapua .243 Winchester brass for barrel break-in and long
range load work up. It was felt that the high quality and intrinsic
consistency of the Lapua brass would contribute to a superior
long range load.
Brass preparation was
identical to the process used on the original Remington brass,
with the addition of a neck expansion step prior to the neck
sizing and deburring processes. A 6.5mm expander mandrel from
K&M, aided by a small amount of Imperial Die Wax was used to
bring the necks up to the proper inside diameter.
Fireforming of the .243
Lapua brass was again accomplished using jammed 142 Sierra MatchKing
moly bullets, over 47.4 grains Ramshot Hunter, and a GM215M
primer. Accuracy was excellent, with less than 0.5" five
shot groups at 100 yards the norm. As with the Remington brass,
no split necks or burst shoulders were observed. The case
water capacity of the fireformed Lapua brass was a bit less than the Remington, at
55.9 grains. This is no doubt due to the heavier
construction of the Lapua brass.
After fireforming,
the Lapua brass showed a pronounced internal restriction at
the neck shoulder junction, thick enough that a bullet would
not pass. This restriction was measured to be 0.005" smaller than the fired neck
inside diameter using a Starrett hole gage.
Inside
Neck Reaming - Results
The formation of
these donuts is, unfortunately, a common occurrence with some
cartridges. Many manufacturers, including Sinclair and Forster
make a special reamer specifically designed to remove the donut
from the insides of the neck.
Although Forster
designed these reamers to be used with their neck trimming tool, it was decided to try using the reamer by
holding it in the chuck of a small lathe, with the rotation
speed set at about 200RPM. The Lapua cases were held by hand,
and carefully fed onto the rotating reamer. The as-fired cases were not
resized prior to this operation, as the reamer was sized to fit
perfectly into a fired case neck.
While the results
look promising under a laboratory grade stereo microscope, there was
some concern that excessive material may have been removed from
the neck walls higher up than the donut, causing undesired wall
thickness variations. It was decide to leave these cases for
further evaluation at a later time, and concentrate on preparing
a newly acquired lot of Remington 260 brass for fireforming and
load development.
260
Remington Brass Preparation - Preparing for Fireforming
Remington 260 brass
again became available shortly after the Lapua donut issue was
resolved. Since the Remington brass was simple to prepare for
fireforming, showed good results in the initial tests, and the
Lapua brass was suspect after the inside neck reaming, the
decision was made to proceed with the project using a lot of 500
Remington cases. The new 260 brass was
prepared using the same process described previously, with primer pocket uniforming, flash
hole de-burring, neck sizing with a Lee collet die, inside neck
chamfering with a VLD tool, and outside neck chamfering.
Again,
the neck wall thickness of every case was checked, and any case
showing more than 0.0015" maximum variation was set aside. Only about 15 cases out of
500 failed this test, with the vast majority under 0.001". In
all, the Remington brass was very consistent, with were
very few burrs in the flash holes, and most primer pockets had
little or no material removed during uniforming.
As before, the wall thickness
variation measurements were made using a shop
made test fixture shown below, but other vendors, like Sinclair
International, sell a similar instrument.
Projectile-less Fireforming - An Alternate Method Using Inert Filler
Notice:
This method is can be very dangerous! Even without a
bullet, very high pressure gasses and debris are ejected
with violence, and can cause significant damage or
injury. Blasting of large holes in walls and
ceilings from discharging this type of load indoors have
been reported. Only perform this process in a safe place
and manner, and follow all firearm safety procedure at
all times.
Others have
documented successful fireforming of Ackley class cases using
light loads of pistol powder which drives an inert filler material
into the case shoulder hard enough to fully expand the brass
into the desired shape. There would be multiple advantages to
using this technique; as there is no bullet ejected, only the
filler and some high pressure gas, the cost is low since no
bullet is required, and there is a good chance that the barrel
would incur minimal wear.
After quite a bit of
web searching, very little concrete documentation relating to
the actual details of the process was found, so it was decided
that some effort was to be put into developing a safe and
effective process. Based on what little information was
available, it was decided to use Unique pistol powder, a
Winchester Large Rifle primer, regular (not instant) Cream of
Wheat breakfast cereal as the inert filler material, and a dab
of Crisco vegetable shortening at the top of the case mouth to
hold it all in during the firing process.
The initial load was
9 grains of Unique, with the case filled to within 0.125" of the
top of the neck with Cream of Wheat. A small amount of Crisco
was then placed on top and smoothed with a finger to seal it in.
A 10cc syringe was packed with shortening and used like a cake
decorating tool to apply the grease evenly and neatly.
Not knowing what to
expect in terms of report and force of the blast, the initial
test was done at the range following standard range safety
procedures. The report was quite loud, about like a starter
pistol or a 22LR. However, other than a jet of gas and vaporized
cereal, there was little recoil, and no projectile or lump was
observed to be ejected. Even so, it was obviously a very violent
event, and not to be taken lightly.
The starting load of 9 grains Unique
did start to form the Ackley shoulders, but there was obvious
incomplete expansion into the very corners of the new chamber.
When the charge was gradually increased to 15 grains, nice sharp shoulders
were consistently formed . The picture shows, from
left to right, an unfired 260 Remington case, a case fireformed with 9
grains Unique, and a case fireformed with 15 grains Unique.
During the first 30
trial shots, about 5 misfires were observed, along with a number
of fired cases having a significant amount of filler left
inside. This remaining filler caused a mess by spilling all over
the inside of the action, requiring a cleaning by blowing out
the action and chamber with compressed air. In addition, the
chamber (and the operator's hands) would get a bit greasy from
the Crisco, also requiring a bit of cleaning with a solvent
patch and a rag. Brake cleaner worked great in cleaning the bore
after a few rounds.
The misfires were
attributed to the forcing of the case forward by the firing pin
strike, enough that erratic or no ignition would sometimes occur.
The 260
Remington brass did not have enough mechanical strength to
resist the firing pin blow, even with the standard Ackley 0.004"
crush headspace setting. The results, while promising, required
another trip back to the drawing board to resolve the final
misfiring issues.
Solving the Loose Case Misfire
Problem - The False Shoulder Method
One of the most common methods to prepare
6mmBR cases for fireforming into 6mm Dasher (6mmBR Ackley
improved) is to introduce a false shoulder into the case neck,
just thick enough and long enough to firmly hold the case in
place in the chamber during the firing pin strike. In the case
of the Dasher process, this is done
by expanding the 6mm neck with a 25 caliber or 6.5mm mandrel,
then neck sizing with a bushing die, setting the bushing such
that only a part of the neck is resized. The position of the
bushing is adjusted until a firm force is needed to close the
bolt on a prepared case. This locks the case in place, and
assures good ignition and consistent case lengths after
fireforming.
For this experiment a 7mm mandrel was used
to expand the neck. The neck was then sized down using a Redding type
S bushing neck die with a 0.292 bushing. The bushing length was
set so that a very firm push was required to chamber an empty
case with this false shoulder. The picture shows an un-modified
case on the left, a case with a false shoulder formed in the
middle that has not been chambered, and a false shouldered case
that has been chambered and extracted on the right. The close-up
photo clearly shows the region of the case that has been forced
into the neck part of the chamber as a shiny ring at the base of
the neck. This crush firmly locks the case into place during
firing.
To illustrate the technique used to
measure the position of the false shoulder during this trial and
error process of adjusting the bushing, the following
pictures show the use of a Stony Point 30 caliber bullet
comparator as a nifty length gauge.
The close up clearly shows how the
comparator rides over the 6.5mm case neck, and comes to bear on
the false shoulder. For the test rifle chamber, a length of
1.800" provided the perfect amount of crush.
Once the cases were prepared with this
false shoulder, there were no more misfires, and only 3 cases
out of 100 fired had any filler remaining inside. This was a
clear indicator that the weak firing pin strike due to case
movement resulted in erratic and incomplete ignition as
well as the misfires. This poor ignition was also the source of the
incompletely ejected filler. No barrel wear was observed through
a Hawkeye bore scope after cleaning with solvent and patches.
All 100 case lengths were within +-0.001" after fireforming, and
had very sharp shoulders.
Conclusions
Once the problems
with case movement and erratic ignition were worked out, this
projectile-less method proved to be very effective, and appears
to offer a significant savings in both cost of components and
barrel wear during fireforming.
|