260
Remington Ackley Improved
Chambering
Switch Barrel for 6mm Dasher
Action and Stock
First Trials
I used an old
6.5mm barrel from the 6.5-284 TubeGun, set it back, and
rechambered it in 260 Ackley Improved. I used a 6.5-243
Improved reamer from Dave Kiff at Pacific Tool and Gauge, with
the throat length set for the Sierra 142 grain MatchKing
bullets. Since the TubeGun design has no recoil lug, I am able
to easily switch barrels in the field, giving me both 6.5mm
caliber options. I will be using Remington brass for the initial
tests.
Based on my QuickLoad
studies, I expected that the 260AI cartridge would yield the same
ballistics as the 6.5-284, with about three grains less H4350.
The results were exactly as predicted. The cartridge achieved
6.5-284 velocities with significantly less powder than the
6.5-284. The best results were with 123 grain Lapua bullets
(Moly) and 47.0 grains H4350. Initial tests with Ramshot Hunter
were also promising. Remington 260 brass was used, and there
were no neck splits out of 100 rounds fireformed. There were no
donuts formed at the neck shoulder junction. The brass had 57.4
grains H2O capacity after fireforming.
Switch
Barrel in 260AI for the 6mm Dasher
Based on the
preliminary tests, I chambered a 29.5" Bartlein 5R, 8.5" twist,
1.25" straight cylinder contour for the 260AI, and fit it to the
6mm Dasher action and stock. Since the recoil lug is pinned,
this makes changing the barrels in the field a breeze.
Here are the
specifications for this rifle and barrel:
The specifications
for the rifle are as follows:
Caliber |
260
Remington Ackley Improved 40 degree |
Barrel |
Bartlein
5R, 1:8.5 twist, stainless, 29.5" finished length, contour
1.250" straight cylinder |
Reamer |
Dave Kiff of
Pacific Tool and Gauge
– 6.5-.243 Improved,
0.297 neck |
Receiver |
Remington M700 right hand stainless short action. Receiver
is
blueprinted; single point chasing of the receiver
threads, locking lugs, and receiver face. Bolt was
re-machined by truing the front and rear face of the
lugs, bolt nose and outside diameter, and bolt face. The
bolt has four small beads TIG welded where the receiver
raceway contacts the bolt body, which were subsequently
machined to provide 0.001” clearance when in battery.
The receiver ring is drilled to accept a locating pin
for the Holland's recoil lug, allowing switch barrel use
in the field. Oversize (shop made) stainless bolt knob
installed. |
Firing Pin |
Speedlock Systems low mass firing pin and CS spring |
Recoil Lug |
Holland's,
pinned, stainless |
Trigger |
Jewel HVR, bottom
bolt release, top safety |
Sight
Rail |
Custom Picatinny
rail with 20 MOA offset, from Brett Evans at Northwest
Armeswerks. Pinned to the receiver with 0.125" dowel
pins. |
Stock |
Richard's
Custom Rifles Lowrider in Green Mountain Camo
Rutland laminate, with polished BAT triggerguard. Stock
has a Limbsaver pad, with about 3 pounds of lead shot in
epoxy added to the butt and handgrip area to balance the
heavy barrel. Pillars are Richard's custom stainless
models, with polished escutcheon on the bottom. The
barrel action is bedded with Devcon 10110 epoxy.
Action screws are Richard's custom as well. |
Scope |
Nightforce
NXS 12-42X56 with NP1-RR reticule |
Rings |
Leupold QRW high, 30MM |
Weight |
9.5360
kg, or 21 lb 0.4 oz |
Fireforming of .243
Lapua brass was done using 142 SMK moly bullets, over 47.4
grains Ramshot Hunter, and a GM215M primer. the .243 necks were
expanded to 6.5mm using a K&M mandrel before seating the
bullets. All cases fireformed well, with no split necks. I went
with the Lapua brass for this experiment due to the lack of
availability of 260 Remington brass from Remington, and the
great intrinsic consistency of Lapua brass.
Accuracy was excellent, at less than 0.5" five shot groups at
100 yards during fireforming.
After fireforming,
the Lapua cases had 55.9 grains H2O capacity. There was a
pronounced donut at the neck shoulder junction, thick enough
that a bullet would not pass after firing. Using a Starrett hole
gage, this donut measured 0.005" smaller than the fired neck. A
case was sectioned, and the donut is clearly visible, as well as
the slight thickening of the neck walls at the neck shoulder
junction:
The throat on the
chamber is set so that only the 139 Lapua Scenar will not seat
deep enough due to this donut. I ordered the reamer with a very
short throat, and used a separate 6.5mm throating reamer to get
the precise throat depth necessary to clear the donut on the
longer bullets. The 142 SMK, 123 Lapua Scenar,
and the 130 Berger VLD will all seat just back from the lands. A
Forster inside neck reamer will be used to try and clean up
these donuts. This may not be necessary, as it is anticipated
that the 123 Scenars or the 130 Berger VLD will be the bullets
of choice.
Load
Development for the 260AI
Barrel
1/27/07
Load development
today used the fireformed Lapua .243 Win brass, GM215M primers,
and Ramshot Hunter ball powder. Moly coated Lapua 123 grain
Scenars, as well as moly coated 130 grain Berger VLDs were
tested. Both bullets cleared the donut as 0.010" back from the
lands.
Here is the full
"safari mode" kit for load development at the Cascade Rifle and
Pistol Club 200 yard "B" range in Ravensdale, WA. It takes me
over 30 minutes to set all this up, if I have the range to
myself:
Here is the rifle set
up in the bags:
Note the
snakeskin-like masked bead blast effect on the barrel. I used
the protective plastic web-type barrel cover as a mask during
bead blasting. It is hard to keep the cover from shifting as you
manipulate the barrel in the blast cabinet. Sure looks good:
OBT loads at 1.346 mS
were targeted for both bullets. The Lapua 123 Scenars ran 3120
FPS, with a SD of 10 and an ES of 25 at 48.8 grains Hunter. The
130 Berger VLD ran 3048 FPS, with a SD of 11 and an ES of 26 at
48.2 grains Hunter, and 3011 FPS, with a SD of 15 and an ES of
39 at 47.5 grains Hunter. QuickLoad confirmed that these were at
the OBT.
There was a LOT of
wind today, over 15 MPH, and switching all over, yet the groups
were consistently at or under 0.5" at 100 yards. The best group
was 0.234", with the Berger's grouping much more consistently (no
flyers) than the Lapuas:
More testing at 200
and 600 yards needs to be done. The Berger bullets group much
better than the Lapua. Not surprising, based on bearing length
and Junke machine test results between the two manufacturers
products. The Berger's were nearly perfect, and the Lapuas were
so-so. The focus will be on the Berger's for the long range load
development and proofing.
2/3/07
Tested the 123 grain
Lapua Scenar and 130 grain Berger bullets on the Juenke
concentricity machine. The results clearly showed the much
better dimensional tolerances of the Berger's:
Juenke Machine Statistics for 123 Grain Lapua Scenar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Juenke Machine Deviation Units |
0 - 5 |
5 - 10 |
10 - 15 |
> 15 or out of range |
Deviation Unit Average for Range |
2.5 |
7.5 |
12.5 |
|
Number |
18 |
87 |
59 |
10 |
% of Total Sample |
10.34 |
50.00 |
33.91 |
5.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Bullets in Sample |
174 |
|
|
|
% In Range 0 - 10 |
60.34 |
|
|
|
Mean Deviation Units |
8.75 |
|
|
|
Variance of Deviation Units |
10.18 |
|
|
|
Standard Deviation of Deviation Units |
3.19 |
|
|
|
Juenke Machine Statistics for 130 Grain Berger VLD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Juenke Machine Deviation Units |
0 - 5 |
5 - 10 |
10 - 15 |
> 15 or out of range |
Deviation Unit Average for Range |
2.5 |
7.5 |
12.5 |
|
Number |
36 |
39 |
3 |
2 |
% of Total Sample |
45.00 |
48.75 |
3.75 |
2.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Bullets in Sample |
80 |
|
|
|
% In Range 0 - 10 |
93.75 |
|
|
|
Mean Deviation Units |
5.38 |
|
|
|
Variance of Deviation Units |
8.03 |
|
|
|
Standard Deviation of Deviation Units |
2.83 |
|
|
|
The Berger's had over
93% of the 80 bullets in the sample showing less than 10
deviations units, and less than 3% over 15 units. Anything less
than 10 is good, over that and you run the risk of throwing a
flyer. 15 units or over is bad and should be used for foulers.
In addition, the Berger's had more than a third of the sample
with deviations less than 5 units, nearly perfect.
By contrast, the
Scenars had only about 60% with less than 10 units, and almost
6% were over 15. Not a great yield for bullets that cost about
the same as the Berger's.
I will be getting
some 140 grain Berger VLDs, and give them a try.
2/3/07
I used a Forster
inside neck reamer to remove the donuts from the Lapua
fireformed brass. The reamer was held in the lathe chuck, which
was running at about 200 RPM. The cases were held by hand, and
fed onto the reamer. The cases were NOT sized prior to this
reaming, as the reamer is sized to fit perfectly into a fired
case neck. The results looked good under the stereo microscope,
and the neck walls did not change thickness or have additional
thickness variation based on before and after tube wall
thickness micrometer measurements. Bullets would slide easily
all the way into the case after this process. The donut appears
to be gone. The cases were neck sized with a Lee collet sizing
die after reaming. Range testing will show if the donuts are
permanently gone, or just hiding.
2/10/07
Remington
Brass Prep
Since Remington
appears to have manufactured another lot of 260 Remington brass,
and there were plenty at distributors, I purchased 500 units for
fireforming. I didn't like the hassle of the inside neck reaming
the Lapua brass, as well as the possibility that this process
could cause excessive runout.
The 260 brass was
prepped in the usual way, with primer pocket uniforming, flash
hole de-burring, neck sizing with a Lee collet die, inside neck
chamfering with a VLD tool, and outside neck chamfering.
Since the Remington
brass is not quite of the same quality as the Lapua, I measured
the neck wall thickness variation of every case using the shop
made test fixture shown below:
The brass was sorted
by thickness variation, and only those that were under 0.0015"
total variation were selected, the rest were set aside. Only
about 15 brass of the 500 were outside this tolerance, with the
vast majority under 0.001".
Indoor
Fireforming Experiment using Unique and Cream of Wheat Filler
I decided to try the
method of fireforming brass using a light load of Unique pistol
powder in a case, topped off with Cream of Wheat cereal. I used
a dab of Crisco food shortening on the top to seal in the
cereal. The idea was to get the brass to the final shape without
the wear and tear on the barrel. Also, I wanted to be able to do
this in my shop, and not have to go to the range.
The first trial was
done outdoors, and it was quite loud. However, there was no
monster jet of cereal to speak of, so I determined that a sturdy
muffler would be safe and would be in order. I then took an old
well water pressure tank that was waiting for a final trip to
the recycle yard, and drilled a 2" hole in the top so I could
insert the rifle barrel. I lined the hole with a piece of rubber
heater hose to protect the barrel. I covered up the tank with an
old moving pad for further damping. This muffled the report very
well indeed, as it sounds only like a heavy piece of metal being
dropped on the floor to someone about 50 feet from the shop.
Passing cars were louder. Please do not try and contain this
blast with a plastic bucket or something fragile as it is quite
forceful. This tank is about 0.125" thick, and made to handle
150+ PSI water pressure. In addition, it is very voluminous, and
the gas has plenty of room to expand. Any smaller volume would
be risky. You try this at your own risk!
I initially started
off with 9 grains Unique over a WLR primer. The case shoulders
were not sharp enough, so I increased the charge to 15 grains.
This formed nice sharp shoulders. The picture below shows, from
left to right, an unfired 260 Remington case, fireformed with 9
grains Unique, and fireformed with 15 grains Unique:
After about 30
trials, I noticed an number of interesting things:
|
If the charge was not high
enough, some Cream of Wheat would be left in the case.
Even after the charge was increased to 15 grains, an
occasional case would have some Cream of Wheat left
inside. This has to be mechanically removed after firing
(compressed air, probe). |
|
Even with a 0.004" crush on
the unfired case (typical Ackley headspace), the force
of the firing pin was enough in a few of the trials to
cause a misfire. |
|
In addition, it was found that
even with the crush, some of the fired cases ended up
short by about 0.005" to 0.010". The firing pin had
enough force to push the case farther into the chamber
than desired before igniting. This is bad since
subsequent firing with full loads could cause case head
separation. |
|
The rifle needed to be swabbed
out in the chamber area, and a patch pushed down the
bore about every 10 rounds or so. The Cream of Wheat
made a bit of a mess in the action, so that had to be
cleaned as well. If it is not cleaned, it bunches up
near the case shoulder in the chamber, and the cases
ended up with a dent where the Cream of Wheat was piled. |
|
The bore cleaned easily after
all this. I used brake cleaner to dissolve the Crisco,
it did a great job. The borescope
showed that no change or damage to the bore occurred. |
In short, I am not
all that thrilled with this method. It is greasy, awkward,
inconsistent in final case length, prone to misfires, and
overall not any better than just loading and shooting. In fact,
I need the practice, so I will go back to my time tested method
of finding a good performing fireforming load, and shooting at
600 yards for fun.
Unique and Cream of Wheat
Method Perfected
After the middling
results described above, I started thinking hard about how to
make this process work, and work well. The advantages are too
great to not give it a good try, given the cost of barrels and
bullets.
The methods used, and
the results, can be found in a article that I wrote for the
6mmbr.com website, found
here. Once
the process was perfected, it was a snap to fireform new cases
to the AI shape.
|